What the essays do
Each essay takes one book and one claim about it, and spends a thousand words or so testing the claim against the text. The claims tend to be small enough to check: why Frankenstein’s creature learns his ethics from three particular books, or why Poe’s narrators are at their most alarming when they are being most careful.
Most of the books come from science fiction and Gothic horror. A few are literary novels that borrow their methods, Infinite Jest and Time’s Arrow among them.
How the essays are written
An essay starts from a claim narrow enough to be wrong and sets it against the best objection available. If a critic has made the argument before, the essay names them. If the evidence runs out, the essay stops there, which is why a few of them end on a qualification.
Every essay carries the editorial byline, a date and a list of sources at the end, split into the novel itself, factual references and earlier criticism. The split lets a reader see which parts of an argument rest on the book and which on somebody else’s reading.
Essays and reviews
The essays link to the reviews of the books they draw on, and many of those reviews link back. A review gives a verdict on a whole book, while an essay pulls out one thread and follows it.
The list below has all 45 essays, each with its book and author.
Questions about the essays
How is an essay here different from a review in the library?
A review covers a whole book and says whether it works. An essay assumes the reader knows the book, or has just read the review, and argues one point about how it is built: a repeated gesture, a narrative device, a choice the plot never mentions.
What evidence does an essay have to show before it is published?
Three kinds, kept apart. Quotation or close description of the novel carries the argument. Facts about publication, biography or science are credited to a named reference. Earlier criticism is cited where someone has made the point before, including where they disagree. All three appear in the source list at the end of each essay.
Does an essay have to reach a favourable conclusion about the book?
No. Several essays admire a book and still conclude that part of it does not work. A flawed novel can be the better subject, because the place where it breaks shows how it was put together.
Why do the essays link back into the archive so heavily?
Because most of the arguments are comparisons. A claim about how Gothic novels use letters and diaries only means something next to the other books that handle them differently, so each essay links to the reviews of those books.